Home / Business / The contradiction-ridden CPI (M) political draft resolution – informationspot

The contradiction-ridden CPI (M) political draft resolution – informationspot

Click Here

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) draft political resolution, released on Tuesday, was criticized by its ally Communist Party of India (CPI) as “self-contradictory”. In turn, the 80-page draft political resolution of the (M) takes note of the CPI’s political line of uniting with all the secular parties, including the However, the (M) draft rules out any electoral understanding with the Congres or treating that party as an ally or a partner in a united front, since it has the same class character as that of the – both being the parties of the ruling classes. Moreover, the resolution notes, the has proved to be incapable of consistently fighting communal forces. However, the resolution identifies the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) as the “main threat” today since it is in power and “given its basic link to the (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh)”. It attributes this to be the reason that the (M) cannot pursue a line “of treating both the and the as equal dangers.” The (M) draft resolution will come up for a vote at its party conclave in April. The draft, which will now be circulated among party state units, which can propose amendments by March 20. The draft states that the (M)’s “tactical approach” should be to cooperate with the and other secular opposition parties in Parliament on agreed issues. Outside Parliament, it advocates cooperation, including with the Congress, to mobilise people on issues of workers and farmers and against the communal threat. It goes on to assert that such joint actions should aid the (M) poach from the mass support bases of the and other bourgeois parties. The final resolution once passed at the conclave, would dictate, among other things, the CPI(M)’s electoral alliances for the next three years, including the Lok Sabha polls. The current draft resolution is backed by senior party leader Prakash Karat, and had found majority support in the party’s central committee meeting last month over the draft resolution proposed by current party chief Karat’s resolution is a much-revised version of his earlier draft, which now leaves scope for (M) having an understanding with the inside Parliament. It also leaves the door ajar for the (M) to have indirect alliances with the Congress, as long as its aligning with a regional party, for example in the Tamil Nadu where its principal ally is the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Yechury’s draft had kept a window open for possible electoral understanding with the Congress, particularly post-poll scenarios akin to 1996 or 2004, where the (M) had come together with regional parties and/or the to keep the at bay. The Karat draft is not explicit on how the party will deal with such a scenario after the next Lok Sabha polls, but its point on cooperation with the inside Parliament leaves score for a post-poll understanding. The contradiction, or rather the impracticality, of the formulation, is starker when it deals with pre-poll alliances. The draft resolution states that “the main task is to defeat the and its allies by rallying all the secular and democratic forces.” It goes on to say that “this has to be done without having an understanding or electoral alliance with the party”. Intriguingly, the draft resolution states that the party should pursue “appropriate electoral tactics to maximize the pooling of the anti-votes” based on its political line that there be no electoral understanding with the party. How this is possible when the faces the in most of its strong areas, while the (M) primarily fights the in its areas of strength, is left unexplained.

In 2004, the Left parties turned up their best ever parliamentary performance by winning 61-seats. Of these, as many as 57-seats were won by defeating candidates.

Click Here
Source link

About sammy

Check Also

Indian companies most concerned about rising protectionism: HSBC survey – informationspot

Indian companies are most concerned about increasing protectionism around the world, a report …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *